首页> 外文OA文献 >Phytochemicals in Animal Health: Diet Selection and Trade-Offs Between Costs and Benefits
【2h】

Phytochemicals in Animal Health: Diet Selection and Trade-Offs Between Costs and Benefits

机译:动物健康中的植物化学物质:饮食选择和成本与收益之间的权衡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many plant tissues contain plant secondary compounds (PSC), which have long been recognised as defensive chemicals that deter herbivory via their toxic effects. However, herbivores may also benefit from including PSC into their diets. Plant-derived phenolics, terpenes and alkaloids have antiparasitic properties and sesquiterpene lactones have antibacterial, antifungal and antiparasitic properties. These actions are inpart a consequence of the negative actions that PSC exert across several trophic levels, including the bacteria, parasites and fungi that inhabit herbivores’ bodies. Given the dual action, toxin and medicine, it is possible to hypothesise that self-selection of PSC by herbivores should occur when the benefits outweigh the costs of PSC ingestion. Recent research suggests that sheep and goats self-medicate against parasitic infections. They increase preference for condensed tannin-containing foods when experiencing a parasitic burden. This behaviour improves health; it is triggered by parasitism and weakens when parasitism subsides. However, the causes underlying these responses are not straightforward when viewed under a unidimensional cost–benefit analysis. This is because the intensity of antinutritional/toxic and medicinal effects of PSC is not static or just dependent upon the isolated post-ingestive effects of single PSC. Nutrient–PSC and PSC–PSC interactions, social models, as well as feeding patterns, all influence the perceived net benefit of incorporating medicines into a diet. A better understanding of the net benefit of self-medication in complex feeding environments will allow for the development of innovative managing strategies aimed at providing the food alternatives and conditions for improving the nutrition, health and welfare of grazing animals. Copyright © The Authors 2016
机译:许多植物组织都含有植物次生化合物(PSC),长期以来人们一直认为它们是防御性化学物质,可通过其毒性作用来阻止食草动物。但是,食草动物也可以通过在饮食中加入PSC来受益。植物来源的酚类,萜类和生物碱具有抗寄生虫特性,倍半萜烯内酯具有抗菌,抗真菌和抗寄生虫特性。这些行为部分是PSC在多个营养水平上施加的负面作用的结果,这些营养水平包括食草动物体内的细菌,寄生虫和真菌。考虑到毒素和药物的双重作用,有可能假设食草动物对PSC的自我选择应该在收益大于PSC摄入成本的情况下发生。最近的研究表明,绵羊和山羊可以自行治疗寄生虫感染。当遇到寄生虫负担时,它们会增加对含单宁浓缩食品的偏爱。这种行为可以改善健康;它由寄生虫触发,并在寄生虫消退时减弱。但是,从一维成本效益分析来看,这些响应的根本原因并不简单。这是因为PSC的抗营养/毒性和药物作用强度不是一成不变的,或仅取决于单个PSC的孤立的消食后作用。营养物-PSC和PSC-PSC的相互作用,社会模式以及进食方式,都会影响将药物纳入饮食的感知净收益。对复杂饮食环境中自我用药的净收益的更好理解将有助于制定创新的管理策略,旨在为改善放牧动物的营养,健康和福利提供替代食品和条件。版权所有©作者2016

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号